No clear
trigger
- There is no defined moment to act.
- No deadline. No external pressure.
- Without a trigger, action is continuously postponed.
Digitization has a substantial impact on the structure of an estate. At first glance, the large number of estate items with a digital footprint stands out. Classic analogue positions catch up quickly when it comes to the real complexity of administration. For digital accounts — for example at online shops — complexity often stems from poor transparency about their existence (usually with limited impact on the overall estate). For material assets, it arises mainly from much higher demands on access, understanding information (for example contract logic), and administrative processes — with a significantly larger impact on the estate as a whole.
Digital has fundamentally changed inheritance
An average estate today consists of 250+ puzzle pieces.
An estate is no longer a handful of clear possessions, but a wide range of assets, obligations, and personal content.
Digital subscriptions continuously create new, often small obligations that add up to growing fragmentation over time. Classic areas have become much more complex, too: a simple savings passbook is replaced by online banking with credentials, phone PINs, two-factor authentication, and device binding.
In total, more and more access elements are required to reach a single estate position.
Note on methodology and sources
It may sound surprising, but until now there has been no robust answer to how many components an estate actually contains.
With this analysis we developed, for the first time, an integrated view of the real structure of an estate and systematically quantified the complexity of personal wealth structures.
For classic assets and liabilities, solid statistical foundations exist. The digital world is so fragmented that simple aggregation is not enough. We therefore chose a different approach and used the one property all components share: access via credentials.
International studies on password use provide a robust order of magnitude for the total number of digital access points. That is our baseline. Within that total we identified, categorised, and individually assessed the structurally relevant components.
For each type we captured two dimensions:
- the average count per person
-
and a qualitative score along four dimensions:
- Access (e.g. credentials, two-factor authentication, device binding)
- Information (e.g. comprehension, contract logic, tax relevance)
- Process (e.g. cancellation, transfer, parties involved)
- Transparency (e.g. awareness and discoverability)
A central finding is that a single asset is usually not represented by a single access point.
Instead, multiple access details and dependencies are required to obtain access.
That is how more than 100 individual values quickly become more than 250 necessary parts that must be brought together to form a complete picture of the estate.
Why we don’t act…
Most people don’t structure their estate in time — not because of an informed, deliberate decision, but because of a combination of barriers operating on two distinct levels:
Layer 1: Why many people never start
No clear
Emotional
distance
- Death remains abstract and far away.
- Even clear life events — a death in the family, a cured illness, marriage, the birth of a child — are rarely perceived as reasons to act.
- Especially for younger, healthy people there is little personal urgency.
Perceived
irrelevance
- Wealth is underestimated.
- Digital assets are often not seen as part of the estate.
- Obligations are overlooked.
Lack of
awareness
- Rules and consequences are not understood.
- What is at stake stays unclear; consequences are underestimated.
- Value is lost — often without anyone noticing.
Layer 2: Why many people don’t follow through
Perceived
complexity
- Legal, financial, and personal factors are deeply intertwined.
- Small changes in life circumstances — such as losing a primary beneficiary — can fundamentally change the intended outcome.
- What looks straightforward quickly becomes complex.
Lack of
transparency
- Assets are scattered across accounts, platforms, and locations.
- There is no single source of truth.
- What exists is incomplete, fragmented, or forgotten.
Effort and
benefit
- Information must be gathered, structured, and documented.
- The effort is felt immediately; the benefit feels distant.
- Without a clear sense of impact, the effort rarely feels justified.
Dynamic
reality
- Assets, relationships, and life circumstances keep changing.
- A one-off, paper-based approach cannot keep pace.
- Credentials and ownership structures can change at any time — what is true today may not hold tomorrow.
Uncertainty about
data and access
- Sensitive information needs secure storage.
- Access must be controllable — yet still possible when needed.
- There is no clear, trusted place for both.
Stopping here shifts a lifetime of decisions onto heirs — with less information, more pressure, and far less time to get it right, while they are also dealing with loss and everything that comes with it.
Digitalization as a multiplier
While ownership used to be the primary factor, access is equally critical today. Unlike ownership, access is inherently dynamic: what is reachable today may not be reachable tomorrow.
This shift changes the problem itself: barriers that once stood apart merge and reinforce each other — and become a structural challenge that effort or persistence alone can no longer solve.
The core advantage of digitization lies in the nature of information: it can be copied, connected seamlessly, and — most importantly — shared precisely. Not only the information, but also the logic of how it is distributed becomes controllable: who gets access, to what — and when.
What is barely coordinateable on paper becomes flexible in the digital world, often just one step away.
At the same time, digitization enables a different way to handle complexity: information can be structured, key points extracted, and scattered data turned into a coherent system — effort falls not by simplifying reality, but by processing it intelligently.
Loss of control.
Why this is critical:
Responsibility transfers immediately…
An inheritance is not necessarily a benefit — it quickly becomes complex responsibility, with time pressure, immediate need for action, and financial risks for heirs.
… transparency does not.
Those who actively manage their data leave successors not isolated puzzle pieces, but a complete, intelligible overall picture — sparing them a great many problems.
Current developments and connections
Estate planning is not a static topic.
Legal frameworks, typical mistakes, and structural relationships keep evolving — and taken together, they are hard to keep in full view.
We summarize relevant developments, show how they connect, and add concrete guidance.